期刊文獻資料庫

論文查詢

論文詳細資料內容:
未授權全文
論文基本資料
篇  名 觸控顯示手寫板應用於國中生物教學之成效─以細胞單元為例
並列篇名 The Learning Effectiveness of Alternatively Interactive Whiteboard Integrate into Junior High School Biology Teaching: An Example of the Cell Unit
作  者 鄭富中 ; 楊景盛 ; 林素華
發表期刊 數位學習科技期刊
出版年份 2011 年
卷  期 3 卷 4 期
頁  次 p.43~63
關鍵字 互動性媒體 ; 互動式電子白板 ; 學習動機 ; 學習成就 ; interactive media ; Interactive Whiteboard ; motivation ; achievement
語言別 中文
中文摘要

近年來,具有互動功能的互動性媒體日益發展,其中強調互動的互動式電子白板(Interactive Whiteboard, IWB)逐漸的成為資訊融入教育的媒體新寵,但受限於數量以及價格之因素,在臺灣仍無法普及;而本研究擬以價格較IWB便宜之互動性媒體―「觸控顯示手寫板」,針對國中學生學習有困難之「細胞」單元設計教材並進行教學,採準實驗研究設計,評估此種替代IWB之互動性媒體於教學上之效益。樣本選取中部地區國中學生共197人為受試對象,分為「觸控顯示手寫板教學實驗組」、「PPT教學對照組」、「傳統教學對照組」,先進行國中生物細胞單元學習成就測驗以及學習動機量表的前測,3週的細胞單元教學後進行國中生物細胞單元學習成就測驗以及學習動機量表的後測,並進行實驗組學生的學習感受問卷調查。研究結果發現,雖然學習動機方面,男學生顯著高於女學生,但實驗組與對照組進行教學後,學習成就皆有顯著提升,而男學生在觸控顯示手寫板實驗組中有較好的學習成就。在感受方面,學生表現了正向的感受,因此在科技發展、設備擴充前,觸控顯示手寫板不失為一互動性媒體的選擇。

英文摘要

"Recently, the interaction mediums are well developed. Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) is one of interaction medium and it emphasize in the interaction between students and teachers. As the result, IWB becomes a new technique using in education; however, it can not available to all because of its price and quantity in Taiwan. Alternatively Interaction Whiteboard is one kind of interaction media and it is cheaper the most IWB; hence, to evaluate the benefit of Alternatively Interaction Whiteboard using in education, a quasiexperiment is designed with “cell” unit and Alternatively Interactive Whiteboard is used in class.
197 students from midland of Taiwan are choose as samples. They are classifying into three groups as follow: Alternatively Interactive Whiteboard teaching group, PPT teaching group and traditional teaching group, whereas PPT teaching and traditional teaching are controls. In the beginning, students have already completed the pre-test of learning achievement and motivation questionnaire. After three weeks for teaching students, they have taken the post test of achievement and motivation questionnaire. In addition, the perception questionnaire had collected from experiment group. To understand their learning perception, interviews are also taken with students.
The results indicate that both experimental group and control group significantly improve learning achievement after teaching, but male students had better achievement in experiment group. In motivation, male students had statistical difference to female students, and in perception, students had positive perception in class. Hence, Alternatively Interaction Whiteboard might be a choice when the schools need to purchase some interaction mediums products."

本文被引用次數:1瀏覽...

說明:為本資料庫所收錄文章

本文參考文獻資料:

吳致維、林建仲 (2009), 互動式電子白板在國小教學之探討, 生活科技教育月刊, (42), 14-25.

凃育嫈 (2007), 線上遊戲教學對國一學生學習動機與學習成就的影響, 國立彰化 師範大學生物學系, 碩士論文, 未出版.

張逸柔 (2009), 不同性別師生互動對學生科學學習刻板印象威脅之研究, 國立中 山大學教育研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

陳仙紅 (2008), 運用交互式電子白板構建高效課堂, 中小學電教, (6), 126-.

陳惠敏、許春峰 (2008), 自然與生活科技領域使用互動式電子白板教學之個案研究, 論文發表於國立彰化師範大學舉辦之「第二十四屆科學教育」學術 研討會, 彰化市, (2008,12月).

陳秀雯 (2009), 運用互動式電子白板於國小四年級數學領域教學之研究, 淡江大 學教育科技學系研究所在職專班, 碩士論文, 未出版.

陳惠邦 (2007), 以互動白板實踐互動教學理想的可能性:教師社群與專業發展觀點, 論文發表於北京師範大學土辦之「Interactive Classroom」學術研討會, 北京市,中國, (2007,5月).

曾千虹、耿正屏 (1993), 國小、國中及高中學生之細胞概念發展, 科學教育, 000(004), 0157-0182. 

黃智偉、林素華 (2006), 國中學生自然科學習動機量表之編製, 論文發表 於國立師範大學舉辦之「第二十二屆科學教育」學術研討會, 臺北市, (2006,12月).

楊郁鴻 (2002), 不同性別學生與教師之互動及其學習動機一國中理化課室之個 案研究, 國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

鄭富中 (2010), 實作Wimote互動白板應用於高中生物科教學, 行政院國家科學 委員會大專生參與專題研究計畫成果報告, , (NSC98-2815-C-018-016-S)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會.

盧秀琴、黃麗燕 (2007), 國中「細胞課程」概念改變教學之發展研究, 科學教育學刊, 015(003), 0295-0316. 

謝臥龍、駱慧文、吳雅玲 (1999), 從性別平等的教育觀點來探討高雄地區國小課堂中師生互動的關係, 教育研究資訊雙月刊, 7(1), 57-80.

Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R. Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005), Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard, Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469.

Beeland, W. D., Jr. (2002), Student engagement, visual learning and technology : Can interactive whiteboards help?, Retrieved February 6, 2009, from http://teach.valdosta. edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vollino1/beeland_am.pdf> Retrieved .

Clark, R. C. (2004), Secretary of state for education and skills address, Retrieved January 7, 2004, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/ictinschools/index.cfm. .

Farmer, H. S. (1997), Women who persisted in their high school aspirations for careers in science ortechnology, Women's mental health & development, (2), 37-61.

Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001), Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-.

Hall, I., & Higgins. S. (2005), Primary school students perceptions of interactive whiteboards, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (21), 102-117.

Hennessy, S. Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007), Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in School science, Learning, Media and Technology, (32), 283-301.

Howe. C. (1997), Gender and classroom interaction, Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

Levy, P. (2002), Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield Schools: A developmental study, Retrieved June 2, 2009, from http://dis. Shef.ac.uk/eirg/ projects/wboards.htm>.

Pfundt, F., & Duit, R. (1991), Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education(3rd ed.), Keil, West Germany: IPN.

Schmid, E. C. (2008), Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology, Computer & Education, (51), 1553-1568.

Slay, H., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008), Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just lipstick?, Computers and Education, (51), 1321-1341.

Smith, F., Hardman, F. & Higgins, S. (2007), Gender inequality in the primary classroom: will interactive white boards help?, Gender and Education, 19(4), 455-469.

Smith, H. J., Higgins, S. Wall, K.,& Miller, J. (2005), Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.

Thompson, J., & Flecknoe, M. (2003), Raising attainment with an interactive whiteboard in key stage 2, Management in Education, (17), 29-33.

Volman, M., & van Eck, (2001), Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade, Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-631.

Wall, K. Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005), The visual helps me understand the complicated things: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards, British Journal of Education Technology, 36(5), 861-867.