期刊文獻資料庫

論文查詢

論文詳細資料內容:
未授權全文
論文基本資料
篇  名 陰柔特質男性態度量表之發展
並列篇名 The Development of Attitude Scale toward the Feminine Male
作  者 黃珮茹 ; 林烘煜
發表期刊 測驗學刊
出版年份 2011 年
卷  期 58 卷 1 期
頁  次 p.87~117
關鍵字 偏見 ; 陰柔特質男性 ; 態度 ; attitude ; feminine male ; prejudice
語言別 中文
中文摘要

本研究的目的在編製一份適合國中學生之對陰柔特質男性的態度量表,以提供未來教學與研究之應用。量表編製過程包括焦點訪談資料蒐集、量表題目編製、專家效度之評估、預試與信、效度之建立與探討。經過兩個以中學生為樣本〈分別284與251人〉之測試,本研究之因褥分析及信、效度考研結果顯示:(1) 因素分析結果顯示本量表在所玉測量的建構上具有相當的穩定性與一致性;(2) 量表具有良好的內部一致性信度;(3) 區辨效度之結果大致符合預期,量表與性別角色態度量表、同性戀態度量表、「娘娘腔」語意差異量表及無意義感量表之相關均為顯著正相關,與個人效能量表及自尊量表之相關則無關。論文最後討論有關陰柔特製男性態度量表如何使用及應該注意事項。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to construct an attitude scale toward the feminine male for junior high school students. The development of the scale included a focus group interview study, the assessment of content validity from 4 experts of gender education, a pilot study with 284 junior high school students to develop the formal items, and finally, establishment of reliability and validity of the scale with another 251 junior high school students. The main results of the studies were: (1) Factor analysis showed that the scale had satisfactory construct validity and internal consistency; (2) The scale showed pretty good reliability; and (3) The results of validity were generally in line with expectations: the scale had significant positive correlation with “Gender Role Attitude Scale”, “Homosexuality Attitude Scale”, “sissy” semantic differential scale”, and “Meaningless Scale”, and the scale also had no significant correlation with “The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale” and “The Spheres of Control Scale”. When and how to use the attitude scale toward the feminine male were discussed and suggested.

本文被引用次數:0瀏覽...

說明:為本資料庫所收錄文章

本文參考文獻資料:

丁曉雲 (2001), 如果學校裡學不到「尊重差異」,所有的孩子都是受害者, 2006 年 7 月 18 日,取自 http://www.dyu.edu.tw/osh/learninginschool.htm .

王家豪 (2003), 娘娘腔男同性戀者的社會處境及其自我認同, 私立世新大學社會發展研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

王翊涵 (2002), 女性特質國中男學生其校園人際處境之研究, 國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

朱秀蓮、謝育貞 (2004), 娘娘腔也是大男人, 星報,C4 版.

余曉雯 (1998), 權力交戰場 ─ 學校中的身體規範與學生的身體觀, 國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

李名揚 (2004), 小學生怕被說娘娘腔中學生在乎重男輕女, 聯合報, C7 版.

李樹人 (2001), 校園美少男被脫褲取笑, 11月11日聯合晚報,第 12 版.

林生傳 (1996), 教育社會學, 高雄市: 復文.

林怡婷 (2005), 性別平等教育協會關切校園娘娘腔、男人婆熬過來是奇蹟, 1月25日,聯合報, C7 版.

林淳得 (2004), 網路酷兒再現娘娘腔, 載於何春蘿(主編), 跨性別, 221-282, 桃園縣: 國立中央大學性/別研究室.

妲奴芭 (2003), 「娘娘腔」勇士們, 載於蘇芋玲、蕭昭君(主編), 校園現場性別觀察, 37-45, 台北市: 女書文化.

施威全 (2000), 校園內的戰爭與反歧視法, 中國時報論壇。 2006 年 7 月 15 日,取自 http://gsrat.net/news/newsclipDetail.php?ncdata_id=76.

秦光輝 (1997), 當兵現形記─從台灣南性兵役經驗看軍權父權體制再生產的性別邏輯, 國立清華大學社會人類學研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

徐懿美、何春蕤 (1998), 從問題少年到同班同學 ─ 性別敵意事件之防範, 載於於何春蘿(主編), 性/別校園─新世代的性別教育, 151-159, 台北市: 元尊文化.

張澄輝 (2003), 保四員警圍毆同僚, 4月28日,中國時報, B3 版.

畢恆達 (2000), 從兩性平等到性別平等─記葉永鋕, 兩性平等教育季刊, 13(), 125-132.

畢恆達 (2003), 男性性別意識之形成, 應用心理研究, 17(), 51-84.

莊采坷 (1998), 多元文化課程方案的實施 ─ 學生經驗課程之研究, 國立花蓮師範學院多元文化研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

陳英姿 (2003), 校園性別體驗隱藏偏見與暴力, 3月21日,聯合報,第 18 版.

陳震齊 (2006), 娘同志在異性戀霸權下的自處與在顫權式陽剛下的認同選擇, 私立高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所一般心理學組, 碩士論文, 未出版.

晴川 (2005), 不罵髒話就是娘娘腔?─暴力從來沒有教育好我們的孩子, 東森新聞網。2006 年 7 月 18 日,取自 http://www.ettoday.com/2005/06/18/142-1805105.htm.

游美惠 (2007), 攸關陽剛與陰柔 ─ 《 性別與教育 》 期刊論文的熱門議題探討, 載於蔡麗玲(主持人),性別研究新趨勢與熱門議題。家庭與工作 ─ 變遷現象與多元想像研討會, 高雄市:國立高雄師範大學, .

黃芳銘 (2004), 社會科學方法學─結構方程模式, 台北市: 五南.

塗沅澂 (2002), 個體對同性戀所持態度之外顯測量與內隱測量比較, 私立輔仁大學心理學研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

楊宜音、張志學、彭泗清(譯)、J. P Robinson,R. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman〈主編〉 (1997), 性格與社會心理測量總覽(上)(下) ( Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes ), 台北市: 遠流.

楊宜憶、高之梅(譯)、V. Burr 〈著〉 (2002), 性別與社會心理學( Gender and social psychology ), 台北市: 五南.

楊嘉宏 (2007), 國中「娘娘腔」學生的性別展演, 國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

裴學儒 (2001), 軍隊文化、男性氣概與性傾向壓迫 ─ 台灣男同性戀者的兵役經驗分析, 私立世新大學社會發展研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

劉威成 (2005), 女性化特質成年男性因應性別偏見歷程之研究, 國立暨南國際大學輔導與諮商研究所, 碩士論文, 未出版.

羅瑞玉、郭明堂、張麗麗 (2000), 性別角色態度量表之編製與常模建立之研究, 台北市: 教育部.

Aube, J.. Norcliffe, H., & Koestner, R. (1995), Physical characteristics and the multifactonal approach to the study of gender characteristics, Social Behavior and Personality, 23(), 69-82.

Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996), Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of selfesteem, Psychological Review, 103(), 5-33.

Breckler, S. J. (1984), Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(), 1191-1205.

Brooks, F. L. (2000), Beneath contempt: The mistreatment of non-traditional/gender a typical boys, In J. Cassese (Ed.), Gay men and childhood sexual trauma: Integrating the shattered self, 107-115, Binghamton, NY: The Harrington Park Press/The Haworth Press.

Duckitt, J. H. (1984), Locus of control and racial prejudice [Abstract], Psychological Reports, 54(), 462-462.

Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (2008), Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others, In R. H. Fazio & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Attitudes: Their structitre, firnction, and consequences, 261-281, New York: The Psychology Press.

Feinman. S. (1981), Why is cross-sex-role behavior more approved for girls than for boys? A status characteristic approach, Sex Roles, 7(), 289-300.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001), Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice, In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations, 278-306, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2005), Types of high self-esteem and prejudice: How implicit self-esteem relates to ethnic discrimination among high explicit self-esteem individuals [Abstract], Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(), 693-702.

Knapp, R. J. (1976), Authoritarianism, alienation, and related variables: A correlational and factor-analytic study, Psychological Bulletin, 83(), 194-212.

Levy, G. D., Taylor, M. G., & Gelman, S. A. (1995), Traditional and evaluative aspects of flexibility in gender roles, social convention, moral rules, and physical laws, Child Development, 66(), 515-531.

Lippa, R. A. (2002), Gender nature, and nurture, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., & McMcy, S. K. (2003), It's not my fault: When and why attributions to prejudice protect self-esteem [Abstract], Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(), 772-781.

Martin, C. L. (1990), Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles, Sex Roles, 22(), 151-165.

McCreary, D. R. (1994), The male role and avoiding femininity, Sex Roles, 31(), 517-531.

Moore, J. W., Hauck, W. E., & Denne, T. C. (1984), Racial prejudice, interracial contact, and personality variables [Abstract], Journal of Experimental Education, 52(), 168-173.

Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J. (1996), Playing it straight: Masculinities, homophobias and schooling, Journal of Gender Studies, 5(), 211-231.

Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999), Implications of recent developments in structural equations modeling for counseling psychology, The counseling Psychologist, 27(), 485-527.

Redman, P. (1996), Curtis loves Ranjit: Heterosexual masculinities, schooling and pupil’s sexual cultures, Educational Review, 48(), 175-182.

Renold, E. (2004), ‘Other’ boys: Negotiating non-hegemonic masculinities in the primary school, Gender and Education, 16(), 247-266.

Storms, M. D. (1978), Attitudes toward homosexuality and femininity in men [Abstract], Journal of Homosexuality, 3(), 257-257.

Thorne, B. (1993), Gender play: Girls and boys in school, Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Young, R., & Sweeting, H. (2004), Adolescent bullying, relationships, psychological wellbeing, and gender-atypical: A gender diagnosticity approach, Sex Roles, 50(), 525-537.

Zucker, K. J., Bradley, S. J., & Sanikhani, M. (1997), Sex differences in referral rates of children with gender identity disorder: Some hypotheses, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25(), 217-227.